Virtual Electromagnetics Laboratory - Prof. S. V. Kulkarni, Electrical Dept., IIT Bombay

Dipole Antenna: Radiation Pattern and Current Distribution (Variation of Length)
~ Contributed by Ruturaj Rao


Fringing Fields - Effect on physical length

Fringing Fields: Fringing is a phenomenon observed at the ends of a dipole antenna, where the electric and magnetic fields extend beyond the antenna's physical length.

Due to the Fringing Fields at the open ends of the dipole, the effective length of the dipole is more than the physical length.

The antenna acts as an open circuited transmission line at the end points A and B.

Let us consider the portion \(l = OA:\)
According to the formula, for a lossless transmission line,

$$Z_{IN} = Z_o \left[ \frac{Z_L + jZ_o \tan(\beta l)}{Z_o + jZ_L \tan(\beta l)} \right]$$

$$ ∴Z_{IN} = Z_o \left[ \frac{1 + j(\frac{Z_o}{Z_L}) \tan(\beta l)}{(\frac{Z_o}{Z_L}) + j\tan(\beta l)} \right] $$

For open circuit \((Z_L → ∞)\):

$$ ∴Z_{IN} = \frac{Z_o}{j \tan(\beta l)} = -j Z_o\cot(\beta l)$$

For \(λ/4 < l < λ/2: cot(βl) < 0 \)

Hence, \( Z_{IN} > 0 \rightarrow \) Inductive

Experimentally, we get a total impedance of approximately \(Z=73+j42.5 Ω\) where the reactive term indicates inductive behaviour.

For the resonance condition, the reactive part should be 0. Hence to get a real impedance the physical length of antenna should be reduced so that the effective length becomes \(λ/2\).

Thus, we have taken total physical length \(L = 0.47λ = 0.094\text{m} (< 0.5λ)\) for a frequency of \(f=1.5\text{ GHz}\)

Following is the comparison of S11 Plot and Impedance Plot for \(L = λ/2\) and for \(L < λ/2 -\)

We can see that the -10dB bandwidth of the antenna with \(L=0.47 λ\) is about \(1.55\text{ GHz} - 1.39\text{ GHz} = 0.16\text{ GHz} = 160\text{ MHz}\), which covers the required frequency of 1.5 GHz whereas the antenna with \(L=0.5 λ\) does not cover the required frequency of \(1.5\text{ GHz}\) in its bandwidth.

NOTE: Although the antenna with \(0.47 λ\) has a bandwidth which includes \(1.5\text{ GHz}\), it can be observed that the minima occurs at approximately \(1.475\text{ GHz}\) (minimum reflection) and not \(1.5\text{ GHz}\). Looking at the impedance plot, the line representing reactance crosses the point of \(0\text{ Ω}\) slightly before \(1.5\text{ GHz}\).

By trial and error method, the antenna with a length \(L=0.46λ=0.092\text{m}\) resonates exactly at \(1.5\text{ GHz}\) which can be seen from the plot below: