Key Differences Between Centralized and Decentralized Exchanges - cyptoranking.com

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

2024-05-04

Popular crypto exchanges(2023 Update) 2024-05-04
Image: cyptoranking.com

The recent JPEX scandal in Hong Kong, resulting in substantial investor losses, serves as a stark reminder of the perils associated with unregulated cryptocurrency platforms. However, since the pool transfer, the price of Bitcoin has risen significantly. At press time, the price of Bitcoin is $27,900, making the whale’s holdings worth about $137 million. Key Differences Between Centralized and Decentralized ExchangesThe community of Frax Finance, a decentralized finance protocol, has announced its unveiling of FRAX v3, a stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar. “You can buy stocks in New York and then transfer them to Argentina,” for example, or “you can buy casino chips in a casino in Uruguay that has a location in Buenos Aires.”

Exchange Rankings Crypto
Image: cyptoranking.com

“The first day numbers were well below expectations, and we no longer see a strong bull case for BTC/ETH in the short term.” Friend.tech allows users to purchase “keys” of individuals, which grants access to private chat rooms with them.The SIM-swap scam occurs when scammers gain access to the victim’s phone number and use it to acquire authentication, which enables them to access their social media and crypto accounts.Manifold Trading, a firm building tools for the ecosystem, estimated that $20 million of Friend.tech’s $50 million of total value locked could be at risk. It called for the platform to beef up its account security measures by enabling two-factor authentication (2FA).Related: How easy is a SIM swap attack? Here’s how to prevent oneThere have also been calls for X to implement 2FA security measures to prevent mobile phone numbers from getting leaked following the high-profile hack of Vitalik Buterin’s account in September, which was also due to a SIM swap attack.“0xfoobar,” founder and CEO of wallet security firm Delegate, advised removing phone numbers from social media accounts.crypto twitter is like a neighborhood where once a day somebody leaves their front door open, gets robbed, and everybody comes together to lament the loss, leaving their own front doors open. instead of retweeting the 75th simswap of the week go remove your phone from everything— foobar (@0xfoobar) October 5, 2023 How to buy Ethereum (ETH) online. Short guideUtopia’s solution was developed using Safe, a decentralized custody and asset management system based on Ethereum. Utopia also collaborated with Bridge, a platform assisting developers in transitioning between dollar denominations, encompassing stablecoins, to facilitate its financial transfers. The team behind the decentralized social media platform Friend.tech has added a new security feature amid attempts to stem a flood of SIM-swap attacks targeting its users.“You can now add a 2FA password to your Friend.tech account for additional protection if your cell carrier or email service becomes compromised,” the team explained in an Oct. 9 post on X (formerly Twitter).Friend.tech users will be prompted to add another password in when signing onto new devices.“Neither the friendtech nor Privy teams can reset these passwords, so please use care when using this feature,” Friend.tech added.You can now add a 2FA password to your https://t.co/YOHabcBL3H account for additional protection if your cell carrier or email service becomes compromised.Neither the friendtech nor Privy teams can reset these passwords, so please use care when using this feature pic.twitter.com/g0m2E4att2— friend.tech (@friendtech) October 9, 2023

Furthermore, Uphold stated the XRP-based contest is open to ages 18 and above who have completed the required KYC procedures. Notably, Uphold’s Sweepstakes officially began on October 6 and will run until October 31, 2023, 23:59 Eastern Daylight Time. Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashLegal proceedings against Uniswap, a leading decentralized exchange protocol, took a turn today when a class action lawsuit filed against it was dismissed. Mike Wawszczak, a legal analyst, revealed that the judge presiding over the case — initially lodged by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against Coinbase — found no grounds to proceed with the lawsuit against Uniswap. The verdict arrived after an extended legal process leading back to April 2021 that scrutinized the specifics of Uniswap's operations and their alignment with financial regulations.The Uniswap Class Action: Theories and DismissalThe plaintiffs' case against Uniswap was built on two main theories: the transfer of title theory and the solicitation theory.In the transfer of title theory, the plaintiffs argued that Uniswap, by writing and maintaining the smart contracts that enabled token transactions, effectively transferred the title of the tokens to them. The court dismissed this argument, stating that Uniswap's responsibilities in drafting the platform's contracts did not imply it had the title to the assets traded on the platform.The solicitation theory centered on the accusation that Uniswap had directly promoted and solicited tokens to the plaintiffs in order to increase the value of their UNI governance tokens. The court considered this theory implausible, stressing that the plaintiffs failed to provide substantial evidence to prove that Uniswap had actively solicited the purchase of a security for their financial profit.Unlike traditional legal cases that focus on particular individuals or companies, Uniswap operates as a collective entity spread across a global network of users and contributors. This unique structure adds to the challenges faced by the plaintiffs amidst the vague regulatory environment surrounding cryptocurrencies.Unveiling the Uniswap Class Action BackgroundAt the core of the Uniswap class action lawsuit was the allegation that the protocol conducted securities sales disguised as digital tokens. The plaintiffs claimed that this action violated securities laws, casting doubts on the regulatory status of the tokens distributed by the platform.Among the plaintiffs was Nessa Risley from North Carolina. She claimed to have incurred a loss of $10,400 in investments across EthereumMax, Matrix Samurai, and Rocket Bunny crypto assets. Her claims suggest that Uniswap may have failed to adequately analyze users and projects on its platform, potentially exposing investors to fraudulent activities.The allegations against Uniswap also included facilitating deceptive "rug pulls" and pump-and-dump schemes. Legal Precedent for Decentralized EntitiesThe dismissal of the Uniswap class action lawsuit might set a legal precedent for other decentralized entities facing similar allegations. The court's decision underscores the complexity of applying traditional legal frameworks to decentralized organizations like Uniswap. This could empower other decentralized finance (DeFi) projects to leverage their distributed nature as a defense against allegations of regulatory non-compliance or illegal activities.The dismissal also highlights the challenges that regulators face in overseeing the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency industry, particularly in the DeFi space. Traditional regulations may not always apply seamlessly to these new, decentralized models. The case could therefore serve as a catalyst for regulatory bodies to reassess and update their strategies, leading to the development of more tailored and effective regulatory frameworks for the cryptocurrency sector.The outcome of the Uniswap class action lawsuit might also impact investor confidence. While some investors may see the dismissal as a positive sign of the resilience of DeFi platforms, others might perceive it as an indication of the risks associated with investing in a relatively unregulated marketplace. Velodrome to Introduce Aerodrome DEX on Coinbase's Base Network How to Buy Bitcoin When You're Underage in 2023?Secure online transactions Exit scams remain an issue

The SEC is suing Binance US’ founder for a litany of federal law violations. However, according to a number of security experts that Blockworks spoke with, swapping between chains could provide the attacker with a number of benefits. Toomey and Sinema Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to ...The idea now moves to community forums for further discussion and refinement. Some early reactions are skeptical — as STRD holders worry that an exchange for ATOM will undervalue the independent liquid staking protocol. Unlike other debit cards, non-custodial debit cards don’t require users to add money beforehand, Matveev noted. Cardholders earn up to 8% back in Wirex’s native token (WXT) for every transaction made.


Sister links

Sources

Bookmark-new.svg